The Copenhagen ComplianceŽ Governance Framework is based on the Nordic
Governance Model
Nordic companies have transformed authority and mechanisms
of the welfare state and sharpened the corporate governance agenda for strategic
business value, development and performance. Here's why and how.
Denmark scores top grades in the annual
Transparency International report and other international Governance and
business surveys. Nordic food has become fashionable all over the world
because of its natural simplicity and Copenhagen has the world's best
restaurant Noma for several years. The Danes are the happiest people in
the world and Denmark is on the top of most lists, when it comes to corporate
governance issues like: political stability, control on bribery and corruption,
efficient public sector, transparency, accountability and legal certainty.
The Nordic countries have been able to raise governance standards and
control the authorities without compromising the individual freedom. Sweden,
for example, created The Ombudsman's institution as the doorkeepers of
the law, already in 1810.
The success of the political, social and the welfare state structures
of Scandinavian countries have inspired many countries in improving their
governance and public policies. This paper examines how the major components
of the "Nordic Governance Model" has developed its far-reaching influence
in the global Governance, Risk Management, Compliance and IT-Security
(GRC) issues in the business sector.
However the current global crisis and the international business conduct
disparities, it is important to create the fundaments of a Global Governance
platform. Here the Scandinavia Governance Model can be compared with alternative
governance models for comparative perspectives that create value for the
enterprise.
The paper will explore and address the prevailing Nordic governance perceptions
to play a guiding role of developing a sustainable and universal Governance
Model related to;
- A set of current and future governance challenges related to sustainability,
society and globalization and the decline of prudent corporate behavior.
The ten components of the Copenhagen Compliance Governance Model, explained
in this paper, provide an excellent awareness and assessment element for
use in the GRC roadmap and framework.
- Total Governance: The Nordic Governance model can be characterized
as 'Total Governance' because it takes into consideration both the
upstream (theory) and the downstream (implementation) components of
Governance codex, issues and concerns. It further encompasses the
governance components of Risk Management, Compliance and IT-Security
(GRC) to enhance the codex and avoid duplication. Enforcing the right
customized code for the company, and building a governing framework
around the adapted roadmap, provides a multidisciplinary and cross-functional
capability that includes the breadth and depth of Governance solutions.
Including the above GRC features The Nordic Governance model can merge
its growth strategies to improving business value.
- Framework and Roadmap: The Nordic Governance model is based
on transparency and accountability to play an active role in evaluating
the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control systems.
The GRC components of accountability provide increased awareness and
energy by using a uniform approach to Governance structures and process.
Commitment and uncompromising execution of the above Governance structure
is necessary to reveal the disrupting elements and actions can be
taken to transforms these into a sustainable advantage. The Governance
Framework can then take an impartial, comparable, unhindered, clear
and open monitoring of the Governance transactions and processes.
The Governance processes are then exploratory, unifying, transparent
and integrative for decision support. The combination of all of the
above and other technical features like board independence, evaluation
of board and committees, compliance, anti-corruption, political risks,
and fraud promotes Governance effectiveness.
- Crisis Management: The wider international acceptance of
the Nordic Governance model that has been instrumental in influencing
the European Governance system. The result has been able to avoid
major governance abuses known from other countries. The Nordic model
has influenced the EU approach to public dissemination of audits,
reports and relevant information including establishing a trustworthy
relationship with stakeholders and media.
The EU Governance structure now provides significant internal stakeholders
and regulatory regimes and confidence in sustainable disclosures to
add value, provide insights and execute assurance on data.
- Open and Independent: Nordic boards take leadership and authority
seriously. They ensure that the tone-at-the-top provides strategic
and operational support for endorsement of key GRC issues. The directors
are involved in procedures to promote diversity and maintain and stimulate
honest and qualified employees. They exercise the decision-making
force on costs, rationalization and optimization of the company's
risk and compliance programs. Nordic boards much less vulnerable to
lawsuits and speculations because they can rely on the support of
an active shareholder and the rule of the corporate business law.
- Employee representation and the two tier system: Denmark
is traditionally in a favorable position on Governance. Unlike many
other western countries, the Nordic boards of directors have more
power, and they use the authority to enforce the GRC agenda for strategic
business development. The Nordic model of employee representation
functions in practice without any impediment to the Board, quite the
contrary; it is considered as a valuable asset.
The 2-tier top management model with clear segregation of duties between
the Chairman and CEO. An understanding of the responsibilities and
ownership at that level is vital for business success. Both Employee
representation and the two tier system compared to other European
and global two tier systems that are Nordic specialties and will be
dealt with in detail.
- Stakeholder contribution: The Governance element to combat
the global 'say on pay' disorder is a non-issue in Denmark. Denmark
is not known for excessive executive pay. The wage level is decent
and competitive, and the strong majority shareholders have the incentives
and influence to protect their interests in spite of the heavy tax
burden.
- Role and responsibility: The chairman and committee's role
and management security issues are conducted without being bogged
down by compliance overreach or added regulation for a number of reasons.
Ethics, integrity and independence components promote codes and standards
to be ahead-of-the-governance-curve on regulation, technology, and
global markets by using a broad Governance framework with an increased
ability to comply with new laws and regulations. Therefore, Nordic
governance model is in continuous development, with increased board
interests to discuss the right solutions in terms of policy and financial
control.
- Focus on Risk Management: The Nordic Governance model monitors
the Governance processes with well-defined enterprise risk procedures
together with integrated internal control and audit policy. High risk
indicators for downstream Governance implications e.g. customers,
suppliers, finance, operations, people, technology, risk, legal, and
tax, prepare not only for the known unknowns, but also for what happens
when the (un)known arrives. Streamlining Governance assessment and
oversight processes the Nordic way can identify opportunities that
go beyond control and compliance. The Nordic validation of Governance
processes focusses on cultural and organizational changes and processes
thru people, process, and data.
- Automation: and the use of IT tools & technology drives the
Nordic Governance convergence process on perceived GRC irregularities.
Establish a clear change management plan and apply it throughout the
IT program is the Nordic Governance mantra. The final evidence is,
given by the fact that The Danes are documenting what they do, how
they do it and why it works. Data trails and IT access is for authorized
personnel and any changes are tracked and detected. Information is
available when users need it. Controls are based on prevention rather
than detection.
- Operative business independence: Therefore, the Governance
intonation of the Nordic Governance model concentrates on the effectiveness,
productivity and leverages risk management to compliance functions.
The establishment of instructions for all Governance and financial
disclosures monitors compliance as part of the ongoing Governance
process and operative business independence.
All of the components together make The Copenhagen Compliance Governance
Model as an International ideal. The governance model can provide an appropriate
alternative to the governance frameworks in BRICS and emerging markets
to avoid the mistakes in the US, UK and EU models that have a cumbersome
and control oriented corporate governance model post-SOX.
The Copenhagen Compliance Governance model http://www.copenhagencompliance.com/TheDanishNordicGovernanceModel.pdf
can be instrumental in restoring global trust in business and management
of future (financial) crisis.